There are different approaches that are used in addressing the concept evaluation as it is performed on a program or project. Some of the most applicable approaches of program evaluation are process and outcome evaluations. Process evaluation is a practical process that analyzes the definite development and implementation that is associated with a given program, and its efficiency is associated the goal of determining whether the implemented strategies and experimental targets have been achieved as premeditated (Ridge, 2013). That is why process evaluation is typically carried out at the end of a given project for the purpose of assessing the overall efficiency of the program right from beginning to the end of the project. Therefore, it is an appropriate approach of evaluation when establishing whether a given program is supposed to be terminated, continued, or expanded as it gives a clear overview of the whole process. On the other hand, outcome evaluation is an appropriate approach that is used measuring significant changes that have the tendency to occur as a consequence of implementing a given program. Therefore, it is an approach of evaluation that focuses on the success and accomplishment of a given program. Inquiries regarding the effectiveness of the program, the unintended consequences, and achievements of goals and objectives are addressed by this approach of evaluation (Ridge, 2013).
A comprehensible outline of accountability and responsibility for all employees in relation to the aspect of safety in the workplace is supposed to be provided by any given safety program. It is the responsibility of a safety representative to ensure that the effectiveness of the safety program is appropriately monitored and, at the same time, carrying out workplace inspections and establishing and following on the possible recommendations about the safety program. In the process of evaluating the efficiency and the success of a safety program, safety representatives also have a responsibility of ensuring that all people understands the idea that safety is the responsibility of everyone (Colvin, Flor Culpa-Bondal, & Sewell, 2011).
Colvin, M., Flor Culpa-Bondal, M. S. N., & Sewell, J. (2011). Nursing Program Assessment and Evaluation: Evidence-Based Decision Making Improves Outcomes. Heart Failure.
Ridge, J. B. (2013). Evaluation Techniques for Difficult to Measure Programs. Bloomington, Indiana: Xlibris Corporation.